The Sunday before last as I walked to the river I saw a cormorant overhead flying eastwards. They are sinister looking things and I’ve never admired them. Mind you, I don’t hate them with the passion some folk do.

I can’t think when I first saw one, but it is likely to have been inland because trips to the coast were rare when I was growing up.

From my earliest days I recall that there was a cormorant on Noggin the Nog that went by the name of Graculus.

This appears to be an historic name for the genus, or at least for a genus. Graculus perspicallatus (syn. Phalacrocorax perspicillatus), the Spectacled, or Pallas’s Cormorant is an extinct bird that lived on Bering Island in the Bering Sea. Perhaps it was this icy ancient bird that gave the cartoon cormorant its name.

But it may be more complicated that that. Graculus is Latin for jackdaw, is somehow linked to starlings and is the Specific epithet for the Alpine, or Yellow-billed Chough (Pyrrhocorax graculus).

There’s obviously a story as to why Noggin’s bird had its name, but I hesitate to try and find it – it’s the sort of thing you go looking for on the internet, only to find after some hours submersed in the ephemeral trivia of vintage TV, that you have not found what you were looking for, but have emerged with a far greater amount of (pointless) knowledge about long-gone kids’ telly programmes than you had at the time you were actually watching them.

I haven’t seen a cormorant for ages, though not as long as it’s been since I’ve watched Noggin the Nog. So, it seemed like a coincidence that I came across this three days later in an old book of comic & curious verse:.

The Common Cormorant.

The common cormorant or shag

Lays eggs inside a paper bag.

The reason you will see no doubt

It is to keep the lightning out.

But what these unobservant birds

Have never noticed is that herds

Of wandering bears may come with buns

And steal the bags to hold the crumbs.

Anon

So the time for Little Boots’ first fishing trip drew closer. We both had rods and reels. The nipper had a small cantilever tackle box that I’d emptied from the garage where it had been full of orphaned woodscrews. The only item in it was a small pair of nail clippers for cutting line close to knots. We did however have a pair of landing net handles (though no net).

Clearly we were still in need of a fair amount of kit. Either a visit to my parents’ home to disinter my old tackle, or a major spend at the tackle shop was needed. Taking a deep breath I chose the former. I had been putting this off for a while. Partly because I was worried that I would find nothing or just junk. Allied to this was another reason that was ridiculously sentimental. It was my childhood tackle and somehow I felt like it should be left to lay undisturbed. Like a fallen warrior. It was probably the best thing I remembered from my youth.

Also to be frank I did not want to end up clearing out my parents’ shed. Eventually I gave way, partly because of curiosity, but mostly due to common sense. Why let perfectly serviceable tackle sit idle? Particularly if I was going to have to shell out cash for some items that might already be lying there.

It was difficult to know what to expect when I made the trip home. Only two things were sure, a feckless relative had borrowed a rod, reel and landing net years back. He was the sort of guy you’d never lend anything to if you wanted to see it again, and unsurprisingly that tackle was gone forever. He was also a useless sod who never cared properly for anything, so I can’t draw solace that it had gone to a home where it would be cared for.

Secondly some years ago whilst I was sorting my mother’s garden she’d asked me to look in the shed because she thought there were mice in there. I recall that I had thrown away a reel case that had been chewed. And some manky bait boxes, but I don’t recall what was left. However the shed was brick-built with a sound roof, concrete floor and a good door and so I told myself that something should be salvageable.

Despite all this prior cogitation I was not prepared for the reality of opening the shed door. I don’t think that it would have been possible to get anymore stuff in there. It took about forty minutes of dragging stuff out and putting it into piles (keep, sort, bin, tip, burn) before I came to the fishing tackle. In an old wicker box barely holding itself together I found a few reels and a couple of plastic boxes containing far less than I remember, but several individual items that I recalled and some I’d forgotten. There were no rods, rests or bank sticks, perhaps they were at the very back of the shed, I wondered whilst at the same time knowing they were long gone. It was clear that this job was going to take some time (I have since made 2 more trips and the job’s still far from done). So I put the tackle in the car along with a load of junk that I was going to get rid of, and returned the stuff that was being kept to the shed.

My Old Man came out as I was dragging a load of crap down to the car. He’s lost the plot these days, following a stroke.

I had a cardboard box under one arm and a reel in the opposite hand. “Little Boots wants to go fishing,” I told him. I talked briefly about the first time he took me fishing. I have little memory of that. He has none.

By the time I returned he was sat on the front doorstep with a large plastic tackle box. “You can have this if you want,” he said. “There’s a few bits and pieces in here“. He opened it and proceeded to show me the contents.

Despite the size of the box it was slim pickings and I judged from the contents that it was not something he’d put together because there were things like baiting needles and bits of carp gear that he’d never use.

He was in truth a pretty ropey angler. Probably the box was something he’d picked up during the period when he was a driver for Age Concern and was always bringing various pieces of tat home.

“And there’s this old sea fishing reel,” he said unzipping a reel case bearing the name of a long-gone local tackle shop.

“That’s not a sea fishing reel,” I told him. “That’s an old Abu Cardinal, that was a bloody good reel in it’s day. People still rate them.”

“It’s a big old thing for freshwater,” he frowned, and I knew that my attitude had come from the same place – big reel = small penis. It was the same expression he had every time he saw a boy racer in a small car with a big exhaust driving like an arse because he thought he was Paddy Hopkirk, James Hunt or Nigel Mansell. As a mechanic, his life had been plagued by softheaded plonkers who knew as little about motors as they did about driving.

I finished packing the car and went back up to the house to say goodbye and he’d gone back inside and had beside him a holey landing and keep-net.

“Here’s some more”.

He had no fishing rod or landing-net pole or bank-stick for the keep net.

This was all a fantasy I told myself driving home. A load of things he’d got together planning to go fishing one day but never had. Going to the pub always got in the way.

Later back home when I was picking through the box, there was in the bottom, along with scraps of line bearing hooks and shot, a crumpled foil packet of the Old Man’s favourite baccy.

Perhaps he had been fishing after all.

Whatever the case, a torch has been passed on.

Note – you may have spotted from my post on 30/8/11 that we have been fishing. That post was more or less made in real-time and is out of sequence with this one and others I have drafted about our first trip and the build up.

It was undoubtedly a failing on my part that until a couple of weeks ago the name Robert Gillmor did not connect with me. In my defence I was however familiar with his work examples of which have formed covers of the New Naturalists Book Series. Not that I have any of that range, much as I would like them, but I know myslef too well and if I had a single one of these beautiful and interesting volumes, I would want the lot, and that is a collection that I cannot afford at present. One day. Maybe. However amongst the books on my shelves is one that bears the artist’s work – Victor Osborne’s Digger’s Diary.

So, when I saw a Robert Gillmor retrospective was on not too far away I marked it down as something to do during the oimpending half-term. Going to a gallery with a seven-year old is not ideal, but Little Boots is pretty god. With an enquiring mind and the ability to quietly observe and absorb he probably sees more than I do if I’m honest. Plus the gallery is attached to a museum which the youngster enjoys visiting.     

On the day we actually had the best mate tagging along too, which did worry me a little, but they were impeccably behaved and did look at the pictures (albeit quickly) to decide which was their favourite.

They did then settle down to watch the video where the artist demonstrated how he built up his lino cut prints. I was told afterwards that the method was like an animation, (something both kids are interested in). This did then morph into a game where they pretended that Mr Gillmor was a man who lived in the telly.

They sat quietly giggling whilst waving and pulling faces at him.

Though dominated by his more recent linocut work, it does cover all of the artist’s work from his childhood onwards and in a variety of mediums. Examples include a pair of rather camp watercolour dragons used on a 1970 BBC wildlife programme, a Radio Times cover, in addition to those for a number of books including the aforementioned Digger’s Diary, New Naturalists, plus a ghostly fish for Fred Buller’s “Pike and Pike Angler”.

His work for the Royal Mail on Post and Go stamps is well represented, but for me these are not so fine as slightly earlier pieces such as Full Moon (2000) showing a hunting barn owl set against the silhouette of a large bull and March Moonlight (2004) where the moon reflects on distant water behind a pair of bounding hares.

I would have liked time to have enjoy further, but realised the dynamic duo were hatching a plan to rescue the man in the telly, which signalled time to make tracks. Ushering the kids from the room with promises of chips, I looked over my shoulder and promised myself I’d be back one day very soon.

Alone.

 

 

This is a piece of street art, but I’m not sure what it’s about.

Situated on what I think is a little power box, on a street corner that I walk by from time to time and set down low I wonder if many people actually notice it. I also wonder what it represents.

 

Who is this guy with a beard, assuming he really is someone.

 

Is it the artist himself? Is it another artist? Or a musician? A writer?

 

Someone religious? A political figure? A prisoner? A terrorist even?

 

There’s nothing on the stencil, or any graffiti nearby that would indicate what it’s about and I’ve never spotted another anywhere.

 

It’s a puzzle, or should that be an enigma?

 

Perhaps that is the whole point.

Today I saw this.

It’s rather fabulous. After dark it will be lit up and paraded around the town as part of an arts event.

Unfortunately I was not able to return to witness this. What was also remarkable was that people were streaming past and for the most part ignoring it. How you can ignore a big cloth dinosaur is a bit beyond me. A few did cast a glance towards it with expressions that said “Ugh! That’s weird”.

I stopped and asked about it and the people I talked to seemed genuinely thrilled when I asked if I could take a photograph.

As I sat on the train afterwards I could only contrast this with the beginning of the day when I passed nearby and marvelled at the huge snaking cue of people leading to the mobile phone shop, all excited at the prospect of splashing a load of cash on a new electronic god to keep in their pocket.

The two sides of the modern zombie, with a dinosaur in the middle.

Does the rule of three that is supposed to apply to bad luck etc . and features in much else in human history apply to coincidences? I‘m not sure, but if it does then I’m waiting for a third one that’s a week overdue.

Last Friday I was reading ‘Hellfire and Herring – A childhood remembered’ by Christopher Rush. It’s a warm and melancholic memoir of growing up in a Fife fishing village after the Second World War, and one section tells of all the retired men, too old to fish, who used to gather to earn a few coins repairing hooks and lines. One of them spoke to the young boy

” ‘You see this gartlin* hook?’

One of the old ones laid in my hand the four inches of iron he was about to whip on. It was bigger than my palm.

‘How big a fish do you think it can hold?’

I shook my head.

‘I once caught a halibut of sixteen stones on a hook like that….I’ve never seen anything fight like that halibut. Sixteen stone if it was an ounce. It was the last hook on the line. We were so close in to Peterhead we trailed it behind the boat, and it was sold alive on the scales, still twitching.’ “

This made me marvel. A 16 stone halibut? That’s over 200 pounds! Now giant flatfish have never figured large in my consciousness, so you’ll understand why it seemed something of a coincidence to read about an even larger halibut the very next day (not in this paper I hasten to add).

But a bigger, and to me, freakier coincidence was to come later that same day.

It was mid-evening and avoiding the X Factor, I was sitting at the PC listening to BBC4 Extra on the iPlayer through headphones. I was catching up on a five programme series that I’d started listening to earlier in the week. Called “The Wild Places” it was about a series of perambulations by nature writer Robert MacFarlane. The particular episode was one featuring a walk in the Lake District and I zoned out pretty quickly as the writing was absolutely mogadonned by whoever it was reading the stuff.

My thoughts meandered off to a series of school walking trips to the Lakes. On the first day of the first of these we set out to walk along a ridge of peaks and stopped for an early breather by a small mountain lake. As the radio blathered away in the background, I googled the small stillwater, and clicked on its Wikipedia entry. At exactly the moment that the page opened for Bleabury Tarn, the voice on the radio said “Bleabury Tarn“.

It was as if someone was reading it over my shoulder and gave me something of a start.

Not just a coincidence, but an amazing piece of synchronicity too.

So since then I have been expecting a third coincidence, but a watched pot never boils, and I should turn my attention to something worthwhile instead.

(*What’s a gartlin hook? See here)

Something is attacking the plants in the indoor allotment. I say something because I have yet to identify them.

Mostly they are on the gingers. A careful look will reveal one or two and they are easily rubbed off, and the plants show no sign of damage. But one plant has a heavier infestation and shows the tell-tale mottling of sap-suckers at work. This is one of the few plants that I have not grown from scartch and so is, I suspect the carrier they came in on.

It’s difficult to describe what they look like because they are so tiny. Barely two millimetres in length, and less than half a mil across, they are dark grey with white markings. It difficult to say more.

I brought some home hoping that the micro-camera I have would provide more detail, but they are just too small as the photo with a penny for scale indicates.

Addendum – I quickly found out from my RHS Pest & Diseases – Pippa Greenwood & Andrew Halstead, that they are Banded Palm Thrips

Last week Little Boots and I went on our first fishing trip together – I will blog about it in the near future.

We went again today, and this second trip very much followed the pattern of the first.

One of us is keener to go on the third trip than the other.

With a very important Harry Potter-themed party in the offing Little Boots needed a wand. Not just any wand, oh no, it had to be Lord Voldemort’s wand, from his youth.

With our own special birthday in the offing, and having just splashed out on a Slytherin robe, buying one was not an option.

I’ll make one I announced. This may sound foolish, and probably was, but we’re not averse to making things here at Boot Hall. So, a week ahead of the friend’s party I downloaded a few photos from the net, printed them off and after studying them wondered what I’d let myself in for.

Voldemort’s wand has a gnarly bone handle and a long thin pitted shaft. “At least it’s asymmetrical,” I said to myself, because this made it potentially easier to make. Or at least better for covering up errors, or lack of ability in fabrication.

So I drew a few lines on one of the pictures and scaled the wand up to a suitable size. This I then drew this onto a suitable piece of baton and when LB was out with the OH last Friday I started to saw away the extraneous wood. I put it away intending to finish shaping it following day with the Dremel, before giving it a quick coat of emulsion in a suitable boneish hue.

Job done.

Or so I thought.

I was just sitting down with a drink when LB arrived home and announced

“You know, Tom Riddle’s wand is completely different to Lord Voldemort’s.”

My heart sank. I went off to look for a picture on the ‘net. My heart sank further. The desired item was a dark, wooden, highly-turned item, that it wouldn’t be possible to make without a lathe. “Oh well,” I thought, “I’d better give it a go.” I copied the picture and enlarged it to roughly the right size.

The next day, having printed off the picture I marked its dimensions off a piece of dark hardwood beading I’d found. I roughly shaped it with the Dremel and then replicated some of the finer turned bands by painting rings on. I should have done this later as the paint bled into to the bone dry wood. Still, at least that meant that it dried quickly.

All it needed now was some varnish. Unfortunately the water-based quick drying varnish had dried in the tin and all I had was some yacht varnish which if you’ve used it you’ll know is unholy stuff that takes aeons to even become touch dry, and isn’t fully dry for about 6 years as far as I can make out.

As I’ve mentioned the wood was bone dry so it sucked up the varnish whilst at the same time managing to stay wet. Eventually it was dry enough and had a sufficient enough gloss to hand over to LB.

I was not hopeful because in truth it looked like someone had stretched out a dog turd and then lacquered it.

Expecting one of those searingly critical evaluations that only small children are capable of I handed it over rather unenthusiastically.

It was met with silence.

Followed by a short intake of breath.

Followed by a single word.

“Brilliant!”

The beholder’s eye is a wonderful thing.

Next Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.